EXPLORE DETECTIONS
Anthropic Organization Domain Boundary Changed
Verified organization domains control which email addresses can join or be pulled into an Anthropic tenant. Verifying, claiming, adding, or removing a domain changes the tenant boundary and can pull in attacker-controlled mailboxes or push out legitimate corporate domains. These events are infrequent and affect organization-wide membership trust.
Anthropic Organization IP Restriction Deleted
Organization IP restrictions limit Anthropic administrative access to approved network ranges. Deleting one widens where a compromised admin session or API key can be used. The audit event does not always carry the deleted CIDR or restriction identifier, so treat this as an early signal and pivot to nearby IP restriction create or update events for the same organization.
Anthropic Organization Member and Group Enumeration
Detects a single user performing at least two distinct organization discovery actions within a 10-minute window: listing users, exporting members, or viewing groups. Chaining these read actions maps membership and group structure and commonly precedes targeted role grants, invites, or data collection against high-value accounts.
Anthropic Organization User Invite Sent
Sending an organization user invite creates a path for a new member to join the Anthropic tenant with a chosen role. An adversary who compromises an administrator or admin API key can invite a mailbox they control and accept the invite to gain durable access. Invites may target internal corporate addresses or external domains; this rule does not distinguish them because invite events do not carry verified organization domains for reliable comparison.
Anthropic Primary Owner Transferred
Primary ownership is the highest administrative authority in an Anthropic organization, covering billing, membership, and organization-wide settings. Transferring ownership to an attacker-controlled account can lock out the legitimate administrator from recovery paths that depend on the original owner. Attackers often do this after role escalation so defenders cannot reverse earlier privilege changes through normal administration.
Anthropic Sensitive Claude Project Role Assigned to User
Detects when a Claude project owner or editor role is granted through a `role_assignment_granted` event. Project owners and editors can access project chats, artifacts, and knowledge bases that may hold sensitive data. An attacker with organization access can grant these roles to persist access to high-value project content without holding organization admin privileges.
Anthropic Session Reuse Impossible Travel
Detects successful Anthropic audit activity for the same user email from source IP addresses whose query-time geo-locations (via IP_LOCATION) span at least two countries, are separated by at least 500 km, and imply travel faster than 800 km/h within a short (~15-minute) lookback. Unlike login-only impossible travel, this rule covers any successful user-actor activity and can surface session cookie replay or concurrent session reuse when no new authentication events appear.
Anthropic SSO Disabled or Connection Removed
SSO routes Anthropic authentication through the corporate identity provider. Disabling SSO, or deactivating or deleting an SSO connection, moves users onto alternate sign-in paths where IdP-enforced MFA, conditional access, and session policies no longer apply. That opens the door to password or magic-link accounts the attacker controls.
Anthropic User Activity From High Number of Countries
Detects Anthropic activity for the same user email from at least three countries and two unique user agents within a four-hour interval. This highly unusual activity may indicate leaked session cookies being abused by a remote adversary using a VPN.
AppArmor Policy Interface Access
Identifies access to AppArmor kernel policy control interfaces through the .load, .replace, or .remove files under /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/. These special files are used to load, modify, or remove AppArmor profiles and are rarely accessed during normal system activity outside of policy administration. Reads or writes to these interfaces may indicate legitimate security configuration changes, but can also reflect defense evasion, unauthorized policy tampering, or the installation of attacker-controlled profiles. This detection is especially valuable on systems where AppArmor policy changes are uncommon or tightly controlled.
AppArmor Policy Violation Detected
Identifies events where the AppArmor security module blocked or restricted an operation due to a policy violation. AppArmor enforces mandatory access control policies that limit how processes interact with system resources such as files, network sockets, and capabilities. When a process attempts an action that is not permitted by the active profile, the kernel generates a policy violation event. While these events can occur during normal operation or misconfiguration, they may also indicate attempted privilege escalation, restricted file access, or malicious activity being prevented by the system's security policy.
AppArmor Profile Compilation via apparmor_parser
Detects the execution of "apparmor_parser" using the "-o" option to write a compiled AppArmor profile to an output file. This functionality is normally used by system administration tools or package installation scripts when building or loading AppArmor policies. In adversarial scenarios, attackers may use "apparmor_parser" to compile custom AppArmor profiles that can later be loaded into the kernel through AppArmor policy management interfaces. Malicious profiles may weaken security controls, alter the behavior of privileged programs, or assist in exploitation chains involving AppArmor policy manipulation.
Apple Script Execution followed by Network Connection
Detects execution via the Apple script interpreter (osascript) followed by a network connection from the same process within a short time period. Adversaries may use malicious scripts for execution and command and control.
Apple Scripting Execution with Administrator Privileges
Identifies execution of the Apple script interpreter (osascript) without a password prompt and with administrator privileges.
Application Added to Google Workspace Domain
Detects when an administrator adds a Google Workspace Marketplace application to the domain. Adversaries with administrative access may register a malicious OAuth application to establish long-lived API access to mail, drive, and other Workspace data, maintaining persistence and enabling collection without relying on a single user password alone.
Application Removed from Blocklist in Google Workspace
Google Workspace administrators may be aware of malicious applications within the Google marketplace and block these applications for user security purposes. An adversary, with administrative privileges, may remove this application from the explicit block list to allow distribution of the application amongst users. This may also indicate the unauthorized use of an application that had been previously blocked before by a user with admin privileges.
APT Package Manager Configuration File Creation
Detects file creation events in the configuration directory for the APT package manager. In Linux, APT (Advanced Package Tool) is a command-line utility used for handling packages on (by default) Debian-based systems, providing functions for installing, updating, upgrading, and removing software along with managing package repositories. Attackers can backdoor APT to gain persistence by injecting malicious code into scripts that APT runs, thereby ensuring continued unauthorized access or control each time APT is used for package management.
At Job Created or Modified
This rule monitors for at jobs being created or renamed. Linux at jobs are scheduled tasks that can be leveraged by system administrators to set up scheduled tasks, but may be abused by malicious actors for persistence, privilege escalation and command execution. By creating or modifying cron job configurations, attackers can execute malicious commands or scripts at predefined intervals, ensuring their continued presence and enabling unauthorized activities.
Attempt to Clear Kernel Ring Buffer
Monitors for the deletion of the kernel ring buffer events through dmesg. Attackers may clear kernel ring buffer events to evade detection after installing a Linux kernel module (LKM). This activity is commonly observed by intrusions that leverage kernel-level rootkits to maintain persistence on a compromised host.
Attempt to Clear Logs via Journalctl
This rule monitors for attempts to clear logs using the "journalctl" command on Linux systems. Adversaries may use this technique to cover their tracks by deleting or truncating log files, making it harder for defenders to investigate their activities. The rule looks for the execution of "journalctl" with arguments that indicate log clearing actions, such as "--vacuum-time", "--vacuum-size", or "--vacuum-files".
Attempt to Create Okta API Token
Detects attempts to create an Okta API token. An adversary may create an Okta API token to maintain access to an organization's network while they work to achieve their objectives. An attacker may abuse an API token to execute techniques such as creating user accounts or disabling security rules or policies.
Attempt to Deactivate an Okta Application
Detects attempts to deactivate an Okta application. An adversary may attempt to modify, deactivate, or delete an Okta application in order to weaken an organization's security controls or disrupt their business operations.
Attempt to Deactivate an Okta Network Zone
Detects attempts to deactivate an Okta network zone. Okta network zones can be configured to limit or restrict access to a network based on IP addresses or geolocations. An adversary may attempt to modify, delete, or deactivate an Okta network zone in order to remove or weaken an organization's security controls.
Attempt to Deactivate an Okta Policy
Detects attempts to deactivate an Okta policy. An adversary may attempt to deactivate an Okta policy in order to weaken an organization's security controls. For example, an adversary may attempt to deactivate an Okta multi-factor authentication (MFA) policy in order to weaken the authentication requirements for user accounts.