EXPLORE
← Back to Explore
elastichighTTP

Kubernetes Client Certificate Signing Request Created or Approved

Detects creation or approval of a Kubernetes CertificateSigningRequest (CSR) by a non-system identity. Attackers who have gained cluster access can submit a CSR with a privileged Common Name such as system:kube-controller-manager or system:masters, then approve it themselves to obtain a long-lived client certificate. Unlike service account tokens which expire in hours, client certificates persist until they expire or the cluster CA is rotated, providing durable access that survives pod termination, token revocation, and RBAC changes. On non-EKS clusters, the signed certificate allows the attacker to authenticate as the privileged identity from anywhere without needing cluster network access, making it one of the most persistent backdoor mechanisms available in Kubernetes.

MITRE ATT&CK

persistenceprivilege-escalation

Detection Query

data_stream.dataset:"kubernetes.audit_logs" and 
kubernetes.audit.objectRef.resource:"certificatesigningrequests" and
kubernetes.audit.verb:("create" or "update" or "patch") and
kubernetes.audit.annotations.authorization_k8s_io/decision:"allow" and
not user.name:(
  system\:kube-controller-manager or
  system\:kube-scheduler or
  system\:node\:* or
  system\:serviceaccount\:kube-system\:* or
  eks\:* or aksService
)

Author

Elastic

Created

2026/05/05

Data Sources

Kuberneteslogs-kubernetes.audit_logs-*

Tags

Data Source: KubernetesDomain: KubernetesUse Case: Threat DetectionTactic: PersistenceTactic: Privilege EscalationResources: Investigation Guide
Raw Content
[metadata]
creation_date = "2026/05/05"
integration = ["kubernetes"]
maturity = "production"
updated_date = "2026/05/05"

[rule]
author = ["Elastic"]
description = """
Detects creation or approval of a Kubernetes CertificateSigningRequest (CSR) by a non-system identity. Attackers who
have gained cluster access can submit a CSR with a privileged Common Name such as system:kube-controller-manager or
system:masters, then approve it themselves to obtain a long-lived client certificate. Unlike service account tokens
which expire in hours, client certificates persist until they expire or the cluster CA is rotated, providing durable
access that survives pod termination, token revocation, and RBAC changes. On non-EKS clusters, the signed certificate
allows the attacker to authenticate as the privileged identity from anywhere without needing cluster network access,
making it one of the most persistent backdoor mechanisms available in Kubernetes.
"""
false_positives = [
    """
    Approved certificate workflows (for example cert-manager, internal PKI rotation, or node bootstrap) may create or
    update CSRs from identities not in the exclusion list if they run under a custom service account. Baseline
    automation that legitimately approves CSRs and tune exclusions for those principals.
    """,
]
from = "now-9m"
index = ["logs-kubernetes.audit_logs-*"]
language = "kuery"
license = "Elastic License v2"
name = "Kubernetes Client Certificate Signing Request Created or Approved"
note = """## Triage and analysis

### Investigating Kubernetes Client Certificate Signing Request Created or Approved

Identify the actor (`user.name`, groups), client (`user_agent.original`), and `source.ip`. Confirm whether the
principal is expected to create or approve CSRs. Review `kubernetes.audit.requestURI` and, when audit level captures
request bodies, the CSR `spec` (requested signer, usages, and requested identity / Common Name).

### Extracting the Certificate Common Name

For create events, "kubernetes.audit.requestObject.spec.request" holds the base64-encoded PEM certificate signing request.
Decode that value to PEM, then inspect the CSR subject (for example with OpenSSL’s CSR subject view) to read the
requested Common Name (CN). 

Known base64 substrings that often appear inside the encoded request for high-risk identities:

- `c3lzdGVtOm1hc3Rlcn` — `system:masters`
- `c3lzdGVtOmt1YmUtY29udHJvbGxlci1tYW5hZ2Vy` — `system:kube-controller-manager`
- `c3lzdGVtOmFkbWlu` — `system:admin`

Priority CNs that usually indicate privilege escalation intent:

- `system:masters` (cluster-admin group)
- `system:kube-controller-manager` (broad control-plane–style access, including secrets and token minting)
- `system:kube-scheduler` (scheduling across the cluster)
- `system:kube-proxy` (node/network–adjacent access)
- Any CN that matches an existing ClusterRoleBinding subject name

### Possible investigation steps

- Compare the CSR name and extracted CN against approved PKI or bootstrap processes.
- Determine whether the same identity both created and approved or patched the CSR in a short window, which matches
  self-approval abuse.
- Review `kubernetes.audit.objectRef` and subsequent authentication or API activity from unusual networks.
- Correlate with RBAC changes, secret access, or TokenRequest activity that preceded CSR activity.

### Response and remediation

- If malicious, deny further approval, delete or deny the CSR per incident policy, revoke or rotate cluster signing
  trust if the CA or signer was abused, and invalidate issued credentials.
- Remove excessive RBAC that allows `certificatesigningrequests` create/update/patch or approval for untrusted
  identities; enforce signer restrictions and approved issuers where supported.
"""
references = [
    "https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/certificate-signing-requests/",
    "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/",
]
risk_score = 73
rule_id = "0f5941c6-3db9-4d2f-91df-06c7c292ba45"
severity = "high"
tags = [
    "Data Source: Kubernetes",
    "Domain: Kubernetes",
    "Use Case: Threat Detection",
    "Tactic: Persistence",
    "Tactic: Privilege Escalation",
    "Resources: Investigation Guide",
]
timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
type = "query"
query = '''
data_stream.dataset:"kubernetes.audit_logs" and 
kubernetes.audit.objectRef.resource:"certificatesigningrequests" and
kubernetes.audit.verb:("create" or "update" or "patch") and
kubernetes.audit.annotations.authorization_k8s_io/decision:"allow" and
not user.name:(
  system\:kube-controller-manager or
  system\:kube-scheduler or
  system\:node\:* or
  system\:serviceaccount\:kube-system\:* or
  eks\:* or aksService
)
'''

[[rule.threat]]
framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"

[[rule.threat.technique]]
id = "T1098"
name = "Account Manipulation"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/"

[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
id = "T1098.006"
name = "Additional Container Cluster Roles"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/006/"

[rule.threat.tactic]
id = "TA0003"
name = "Persistence"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0003/"

[[rule.threat]]
framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"

[[rule.threat.technique]]
id = "T1098"
name = "Account Manipulation"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/"

[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
id = "T1098.006"
name = "Additional Container Cluster Roles"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/006/"

[rule.threat.tactic]
id = "TA0004"
name = "Privilege Escalation"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0004/"